🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.